In response to the long pending demand and relentless efforts by the NBMM, the Government of Assam has issued a notification and the gazzete has been published, based on which the Government of India (GoI) will very soon issue the OBC status to Bishnupriya Manipuri community.
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
DEPARTMENT FOR WELFARE OF PLAIN TRIBES & BACKWARD CLASSES
DISPUR GUWAHATI.
ORDERS BY THE GOVERNOR
NOTIFICATION
Dated Dispur the 7th September, 2010
No. TAD/BC/126/2006/Pt-I/30: In continuation of Govt. notification No. TAD/BC/268/75/37 dtd. 27/12/1975, the Governor of Assam is pleased to enlist a separate identity of the Bishnupriya Manipuri as Sl. No. 30 in the list of Other Backward Classes instead of No. 13 for the purpose of reservation in public services in the state of Assam under Article 16(4) of the Constitution of India.
sd/-
Principal Secretary to the Govt. of Assam,
WPT & BC Department, Dispur.
Memo No. TAD/BC/126/2006/Pt-I/30(A) Dated Dispur the 7th September, 2010
Copy to:
1. - - - - - - - - -
- - - - -
- - - -
9. - - - - - - - -
10. The President, Nikhil Bishnupriya Manipuri Mahasabha, Green View Nursing
Home, N.S. Avenue, Silchar, Assam.
By order etc
sd/-
Deputy Secretary to the Govt. of Assam,
WPT & BC Department, Dispur.
The news item of Sentinel.
ReplyDelete“Govt. Of India
will very soon issue the OBC status to
BM Community.” How much would it be
reliable? And what assurance did Mahasabha receive from GOI,for which this
announcement has been made? Having a BM- MLA at his disposal( for whom he was
longing for), the NBMM president has taken four long years (after winning of the
SC case) to get the amendment done by the Govt. of Assam. Every Bishnupriya
Manipuri knows, the OBC status had already been bestowed on us, only the word ‘Bishnupriya’
was to be prefixed as per SC order.In that case how can we assure that it would
not take longer time? Delhi
is far more away from Silchar than Guwahati.
And we can’t
understand why was the stale news, WPT& BC letter TAD/BC/126/2006/Pt-
1/30(A) dated 07 Sept. 2010, was
published in ‘Sentinel’ after a lapse of 8 months? Is it to tell the people
that Mahasabha has no official address other than one mentioned below or for publicity to gain
cheap popularity?
Copy to :-.1,2,.. 9. Presient, NBMM, Green View Nursing Home N.S. Avenue, Silchar,
Assam
..................................................................
The news item of
Sentinel “BMDC in Tripura likely” can
not be digested, because source is not at all reliable. So far no local papers,
carried this important news. Let NBMM
Secretary General Shri Uday Sinha come up with the real fact. It was found out
from a very reliable source in Govt. that there have not been any such talk held so far on BMDC. Let the
NBMM state committee clarify the news ie. in which level of Govt. they had a
talk. News which has been received is, as
follow ;-
On July 26, an oath taking ceremony was held at Dalugao, Kailashahar where only 22 members
took oath, not 47 as suggested by Shri Uday Sinha, the Sec. General. In that
meeting a resolution was taken that a deputation would go to Agartala to submit the demands
:-1. for a DC for BM and 2. Appointment of BM language teachers. I
couldn’t fathom why was Shri Uday Sinha silent on this burning issue? We must
be very careful about the distorted news
spreading around and as we take all the news coming up from NBMM ,BMDC or
others as true staying far from the
reality
So far, office bearers never come up with the news on renewal
of NBMM registration after the show cause
notice was served by the Registrar of Society? I would like to request NBMM
authority not to play with the sentiment of people. Be justified and transparent
.
The above article or remarks are for the name of curiosity
not for criticize or blame.
REGARDS.